0b7cc0e510ef05ad394a36d9cee9ddf5f2ae912f
Title
SciShift: Tracking Semantic Evolution in Scientific Communication with Contrastive Learning
Problem Statement
Accurately tracking how scientific concepts and findings evolve as they are communicated across different channels (e.g., academic papers, press releases, news articles, social media) remains challenging for current language models. Existing approaches often rely on lexical overlap or simple semantic similarity metrics, which fail to capture nuanced changes in meaning or framing.
Motivation
Recent advances in contrastive learning and multi-task pretraining offer promising avenues for creating models that can better identify subtle semantic shifts while maintaining domain knowledge. By leveraging these techniques, we can develop a model that is more sensitive to changes in scientific communication across different mediums and audiences. This approach could provide valuable insights into how scientific information is transformed and potentially distorted as it moves from academic circles to the general public.
Proposed Method
We propose SciShift, a novel architecture that combines a scientific domain-specific encoder with a general-purpose semantic change detector. The scientific encoder will be initialized with weights from a large language model (e.g., RoBERTa) and further pretrained on a corpus of scientific papers using masked language modeling and citation prediction tasks. The semantic change detector will be trained using contrastive learning on a curated dataset of scientific concept paraphrases with varying degrees of information change. During inference, SciShift will encode pairs of statements (e.g., original research finding and news article summary) and compute a multi-dimensional semantic shift vector. This vector will capture changes along different aspects like certainty, generalizability, and practical implications. To handle longer texts, we will use a hierarchical attention mechanism that first encodes sentence-level representations before aggregating them into document-level embeddings.
Step-by-Step Experiment Plan
Step 1: Data Collection and Preprocessing
Step 2: Model Architecture
Step 3: Pretraining
Step 4: Contrastive Learning
Step 5: Fine-tuning
Step 6: Evaluation
Step 7: Case Studies
Test Case Examples
Baseline Prompt Input
Original: 'Our study suggests a potential link between coffee consumption and reduced risk of type 2 diabetes.'
Paraphrase: 'Scientists prove that drinking coffee prevents diabetes.'
Baseline Prompt Expected Output
High similarity (0.85)
Proposed Prompt Input
Original: 'Our study suggests a potential link between coffee consumption and reduced risk of type 2 diabetes.'
Paraphrase: 'Scientists prove that drinking coffee prevents diabetes.'
Proposed Prompt Expected Output
Semantic shift detected:
- Certainty: Increased (0.7)
- Generalizability: Increased (0.6)
- Practical implications: Increased (0.8)
Overall shift magnitude: 0.7
Explanation
The baseline method fails to capture the significant changes in certainty and generalizability between the original statement and the paraphrase. SciShift, on the other hand, provides a more nuanced analysis of the semantic shifts along multiple dimensions, offering a more accurate representation of how the scientific finding has been transformed.
Fallback Plan
If SciShift does not significantly outperform baselines, we can pivot the project to focus on analyzing patterns of information change in scientific communication. We would use the collected SciEvol dataset to conduct a large-scale analysis of how scientific findings are typically transformed across different media. This could involve clustering semantic shift vectors to identify common patterns of distortion or simplification. We could also investigate which types of scientific findings are most prone to misrepresentation and at which stages of the communication chain the most significant shifts occur. Additionally, we could explore using SciShift's intermediate representations to develop an interpretable tool for science communicators, helping them identify potential areas of misunderstanding or misrepresentation in their writing.